The 2013 Honda Fit offers two transmission options: a 5-speed manual and a 5-speed automatic. There is no CVT option for this model year.
Transmission options for the 2013 Honda Fit
Honda did not offer a continuously variable transmission (CVT) on the 2013 Fit. Buyers could choose between a traditional 5-speed manual or a conventional 5-speed automatic, with availability depending on trim and market.
Before listing the options, note that both transmissions were designed to fit the car’s practical, fuel-efficient character and share the same 1.5-liter engine setup.
- 5-speed manual transmission: Standard on certain trims, this option offers driver control with a traditional clutch and gear lever, appealing to enthusiasts or those who prefer engaging shifts.
- 5-speed automatic transmission: A conventional automatic with a torque converter, providing smooth, easy shifts and convenient operation in urban driving.
Both transmissions are paired with the same engine and overall drivetrain layout, so the choice mainly affects driving style, engagement, and potential fuel-economy nuances.
Manual vs automatic: driving and efficiency notes
Drive feel differs between the two transmissions. The manual provides more direct control and may feel more energetic during spirited driving, while the automatic emphasizes ease of use, especially in stop-and-go traffic. Real-world fuel economy between the two options is typically similar, though minor differences can occur depending on driving conditions and individual habits.
How to identify which transmission your 2013 Fit has
Check the vehicle’s pedals and shifter: a clutch pedal on the far left indicates a manual; if there is no clutch pedal and the shifter shows Park/Reverse/Neutral/Drive (P-R-N-D), you have the automatic. Owners can also verify via the VIN or the original window sticker.
Summary
The 2013 Honda Fit was offered with two traditional transmissions—5-speed manual and 5-speed automatic—with no CVT option. Your choice affected driving engagement and city-driving convenience more than overall capability, while both options shared the same efficient 1.5-liter engine setup.