For a quick takeaway: the 2014 CR-V EX adds several comfort and tech features over the LX—such as a sunroof, fog lights, automatic climate control, and a more capable infotainment system—while both trims share the same engine and fundamental design. Exact equipment can vary by market and optional packages.
The 2014 Honda CR-V in the United States offered LX, EX, EX-L, and Navi-equipped variants. This article focuses on the LX versus EX comparison, outlining the typical features that differentiate the two trims and noting where regional differences or factory packages may apply.
Shared mechanical foundation
Both the LX and EX share the same core mechanical package. They use Honda’s 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine paired with a five-speed automatic transmission, and Real Time all-wheel-drive is available as an option. The driving dynamics and power delivery are essentially the same across these two trims.
What EX adds over LX
Below are the features commonly included in the EX that are not standard on the LX. Note that exact equipment can vary by market and by the presence of optional packages.
Exterior features
- Power moonroof (sunroof)
- Fog lights
- Generally upgraded exterior styling details and sometimes different wheel finishes depending on the package
These exterior enhancements give the EX a more premium appearance and improve daytime lighting and openness inside the cabin.
Interior and infotainment features
- Automatic climate control (as opposed to manual climate control on some LX configurations)
- Upgraded infotainment system, typically with a larger display and enhanced audio capabilities
- Better overall interior trim and comfort items relative to the LX, with EX-L and Navi variants expanding on these features further
These interior and tech improvements are designed to boost daily usability, comfort, and connection options, making the EX a more feature-rich choice without changing the fundamental drivetrain.
Other considerations
Navigation, leather seating, and certain high-end audio options are typically reserved for EX-L and Navi-equipped models rather than the EX. Real-time AWD remains an option for both trims, and pricing reflects the added gear on the EX. Always verify the exact build with the dealer, as regional differences and package availability can alter the lineup.
Bottom line
The primary distinction between the 2014 CR-V LX and EX is feature content rather than performance. The EX builds on the LX with added comfort, convenience, and infotainment features, making it the more capable and premium-feeling choice within the base-to-midtrim range. If those added niceties are important to you, the EX is worth the upgrade; if you prioritize a simpler, lower-cost package, the LX remains a solid option.
Summary: The 2014 CR-V LX vs EX difference centers on feature content. EX adds a sunroof, fog lights, automatic climate control, and a more capable infotainment setup, while both trims share the same engine and overall driving dynamics. Check the exact build for your region or dealer package, as specifics can vary.
Is 2014 a good year for a Honda CR-V?
Among the 507 owners who provided feedback on the 2014 Honda CR-V for Kelley Blue Book, consumer sentiment is mostly positive, with 73% recommending the vehicle. As a whole, consumers found the vehicle's reliability and styling to be its strongest features and performance to be its weakest.
What is better, CR-V EX or LX?
The LX trim is the base Honda CR-V trim, while the EX is an upgraded mid-range trim, adding popular features like a moonroof, heated front seats, dual-zone automatic climate control, remote engine start, USB-C charging ports, and 18-inch alloy wheels.
Which CR-V year to stay away from?
The first CR-V of the 21st century sees an increase in engine-related issues and the beginning of a series of recalls for defective airbags (the notorious Takata airbag recall). The recall affected numerous model years (mostly 2002-2015), so always check this out if you're buying a used CR-V.
What is the lawsuit on the 2014 Honda CR-V?
Nature of the Case
The lawsuit alleges that American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (“Defendants” or “Honda”) manufactured Class Vehicles with a variable valve timing control (“VTC”) actuator prone to rattle briefly at cold startup.